Select Medical Study Design
Choose your research methodology to load the exact WHO/Cochran formula
Quickly calculate the required sample size and statistical power for your clinical research, FCPS synopsis, dissertation, or randomized trial. Select your study design below to generate your sample size and copy your official CPSP synopsis justification paragraph instantly.
Choose your research methodology to load the exact WHO/Cochran formula
Cross-Sectional / Prevalence Parameters
From previous published literature / local reference study.
Standard medical research precision is 5% (0.05) or 3% to 7%.
r = 0.1 (Small effect), r = 0.3 (Moderate effect), r = 0.5 (Large effect).
In medical research and postgraduate clinical training (such as FCPS, MCPS, MD, MS, and PhD dissertations), determining the appropriate sample size is a mandatory ethical and scientific requirement. Institutional Review Boards (IRB), the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP), and international indexed journals (PubMed, Scopus) strictly scrutinize the sample size calculation section of any synopsis or protocol before granting approval.
An underpowered study increases Type II error (β), meaning real clinical differences between treatments or prevalence patterns will fail to achieve statistical significance ($p < 0.05$), wasting time, clinical effort, and patient participation.
Enrolling excessively large numbers of patients exposes unnecessary subjects to experimental procedures, delays dissertation completion, and squanders financial resources without adding scientific benefit.
| Study Design | Primary Statistical Formula | Required Key Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Cross-Sectional (Prevalence) | n = (Z1-α/22 × P(1-P)) / d2 | Expected prevalence (P), Margin of error (d), 95% CI |
| RCT / Two Independent Means | n = 2 × (Zα + Zβ)2 × σ2 / (μ1 - μ2)2 | Mean difference (Δ), Standard deviation (σ), 80% Power |
| Case-Control (Odds Ratio) | Fleiss / Kelsey formula with OR | Control exposure (P2), Anticipated Odds Ratio (OR), Ratio (r) |
| Diagnostic Accuracy Test | n = (Z2 × Sens × (1-Sens)) / (d2 × Prev) | Sensitivity, Specificity, Precision (d), Disease Prevalence |
| Correlation Coefficient | n = ((Zα + Zβ) / 0.5·ln((1+r)/(1-r)))2 + 3 | Expected correlation (r), Power (80%), Alpha (0.05) |
Alpha represents the probability of a False Positive result (Type I error). In medical research, α is universally set to 0.05 (5%), corresponding to a 95% Confidence Level ($Z = 1.96$).
Power is the probability that your study will correctly detect a genuine clinical effect if one truly exists. The accepted benchmark is 80% Power ($Z = 0.84$) or 90% Power ($Z = 1.28$).
The acceptable distance between the sample estimate and the true population value. In single proportion studies, precision is commonly taken as 5% (0.05). Narrower precision (e.g. 2%) dramatically increases sample size.
Patients may withdraw consent, experience adverse events, or get lost to follow-up. Adding a 10% to 15% attrition buffer ensures your final analyzed dataset maintains statistical validity.
Your synopsis methodology must state: the software/formula used (e.g., WHO sample size calculator), the confidence level (95%), margin of error (e.g., 5%), reference prevalence/mean from a cited published paper, and the final calculated number adjusted for non-response. You can directly copy our auto-generated paragraph into Section 5 of your CPSP synopsis form.
If no prior local or international literature exists, biostatistical convention dictates using P = 50% (0.50). Because $P(1-P)$ is maximized at 0.50, this yields the most conservative (maximum safe) sample size of 384 patients at 95% CI and 5% precision. Alternatively, a pilot study of 20–30 patients can be conducted.
Yes! Medswrites specializes in comprehensive SPSS statistical analysis for medical trainees. We perform variable definition, data cleaning, normality testing (Shapiro-Wilk), parametric/non-parametric tests (t-tests, Mann-Whitney, Chi-Square, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis), and regression modeling with publication-ready APA/Vancouver tables.
80% power means there is an 80% chance of detecting a statistically significant difference if a real clinical difference exists (with a 20% Type II error risk). 90% power increases rigor by reducing Type II error to 10%, but requires approximately 30% more patients.
Quickly jump between our verified medical and academic tools
Calculate sample size for comparing two proportions with Kelsey, Fleiss, and Continuity Correction formulas.
Simulate MCQ (Section 1) and FRQ (Section 2) points to estimate composite scores (1 to 5) with full historical curves.
Formulas calibrated and verified according to World Health Organization (WHO) Sample Size Determination in Health Studies guidelines and CPSP RTMC biostatistical requirements.